


Niwaki Herbaceous SickleA. K. A. Nokogama Rice Sickle Ideal for rip cutting grasses and old herbaceous stuff. What they use in Japan for hand harvesting rice, but some bright spark realised that the same thing works just as well (i. e. brilliantly) on herbaceous stuff and grasses over here. Serrated blade copes with tough, dry stalks: grab a handful, cut with a single, strong sawing action. 82g 320 x 23 x 29mm 160mm blade Carbon Steel Poplar handle Made in Japan Includes
Quick Dispatch:
Your Niwaki Herbaceous Sickle orders ship within 1-2 business days.
Delivery Options:
- Standard: 3-7 business days
- Fast: 2-3 business days
- Express: 1-2 business days
Order Tracking:
You'll receive a tracking link by email once your Niwaki Herbaceous Sickle ships.
Need Help?
Questions about Niwaki Herbaceous Sickle, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.
Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for Niwaki Herbaceous Sickle in your area.
Get Shipping Estimates
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
You may also like
4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 896 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 4
Great quality for price
Material Type: Recycled Polyester, Color: Red Stripe, Size: XX-Large
Very impressed with the shirt quality, especially for such a low price. Sizing is accurate.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 21, 2026
★★★★★ 5
For work or casual wear, this polo is a great choice.
Material Type: Recycled Polyester, Color: Port Stripe, Size: X-Large
I really like this polo. I've been wearing it once a week or every other week since November. Its very comfortable and breathable. This polo feels like it should last a while. The fit is good. I typcally wear XL and this XL fits great. I've pruchased it in both burgundy and black so far. I definitely recommend this shirt. For work or casual wear, this will look good.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 11, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Great value: These are my go-to work from home shirt
Material Type: Recycled Polyester, Color: Blue, Size: X-Large
I’ve been pleasantly surprised by these shirts and wear them weekly for Zoom calls, since I’m still working from home these days. I figured at the price point it was worth trying them out, and now I’ve bought several in different colors. They aren’t super soft, but they are comfy and look nice. I’m 6’1” ~220 pounds, and the XL slim fit still has plenty of room. I imagine the regular cut is incredibly boxy and oversized. The difference between polyester vs recycled polyester is inconsequential.
I typically buy expensive golf shirts, and these definitely aren’t as nice. They are a fraction of the cost though and a great “beater” work shirt / hang out shirt. It’s nice wearing something that looks and feels decent, but if something happens to it, you can toss and it and pick up another for the cost of a chipotle burrito.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 29, 2022
★★★★★ 3
Great price, not great quality
Material Type: Recycled Polyester, Color: Black, Size: Small
Simple, straight forward all black polo. I am a size medium woman (with some room since I don't like form-fitting) and bought a men's small. Fits perfectly for my frame. Long enough to tuck in for my part-time extra weekend job uniform. Also suitable for the golf course. A little thin, and if you hold it up to light you can sort of see through it. *Not* flowy, soft and smooth fabric like a rash guard/sun shirt - more structured than that. But it's cool and does the job for the price under $10.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 13, 2024
★★★★★ 5
Recommend
Material Type: Recycled Polyester, Color: Dark Navy, Size: X-Large
Great fit, right price
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 18, 2026