PreSonus StudioLive 16.0.2 USB 16x2 Performance and Recording Digital Mixer

PreSonus StudioLive 16.0.2 USB 16x2 Performance and Recording Digital Mixer

Marsoni

M251S

$999.50

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

PreSonus StudioLive 16.0.2 USB 16x2 Performance and Recording Digital MixerWhen youre mixing a live event or have an artist in the studio, you need to be able to work quickly. The StudioLive 16. 0. 2 USBs familiar, easy to use interface keeps all critical controls visible and accessible not buried in menus or layers. Our design philosophy is simple: One fader for every mono or stereo channel; one output for every bus. Add to that easily accessed, color coded function buttons; rotary trim controls; and clearly labeled,

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your PreSonus StudioLive 16.0.2 USB 16x2 Performance and Recording Digital Mixer orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your PreSonus StudioLive 16.0.2 USB 16x2 Performance and Recording Digital Mixer ships.

Need Help?
Questions about PreSonus StudioLive 16.0.2 USB 16x2 Performance and Recording Digital Mixer, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for PreSonus StudioLive 16.0.2 USB 16x2 Performance and Recording Digital Mixer in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

This is a great idea that was badly done. On the production side, insufficient glue in the binding causes pages to fall out when you turn them - dozens of pages, not just one or two. This is surprising given the good quality of the paper and cover. As for content, the writing is very poor & shallow. I'm reminded of a high school essay by poor student unfamiliar with history who is looking looking up the subject matter on Wikipedia as they go but leaving out all the good stuff. For example, we get a king list for Kush spread over several pages, but virtually no actual history -- despite the fact that all of Egypt was there to quote from for at least the enemy's side of the story, and Assyrian sources could have been cited as well. I don't gain much new information from the 50th repetition of "nobody knows this" and "nobody knows that." A real historian can impost structure on the unknowns by showing the archaeology or citing history & folklore & epigraphs. This could have been presented in simple high school language, outlining the alternative possibilities from the little we do know, and explaining how we know what little we know. Photographs of actual ruins and art would help. Unfortunately the subject matter is really not touched. Too bad. This could have been a very good project.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on May 8, 2021